-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Test54 #58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
cobbdan
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Security Review Summary
This PR introduces critical security vulnerabilities that must be addressed before merging:
🚨 Critical Issues (Must Fix):
- Hardcoded credentials: API keys, passwords, and database connection strings in source code
- Command injection: Unsafe execution of user input in shell commands
- Path traversal: Unvalidated file path access
- SQL injection: Direct interpolation of user input in SQL queries
⚠️ Security Concerns:
- Downloading external code during production builds without verification
✅ Positive Notes:
- EventBridge Scheduler implementation shows good input validation practices
- Well-structured code organization for the new AWS service integration
Recommendation: Please remove all hardcoded credentials and fix the injection vulnerabilities before requesting another review. Consider using environment variables, AWS Secrets Manager, or other secure credential management solutions.
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Hardcoded API key detected. This exposes sensitive credentials in source code and should be removed immediately. Use environment variables or secure credential management instead.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/q Please help me fix this issue but do it in a new pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay I will start working on a new pull request that addresses this security issue. Would you like me to also address any of these other critical issues as well?
- Command injection: Unsafe execution of user input in shell commands
- Path traversal: Unvalidated file path access
- SQL injection: Direct interpolation of user input in SQL queries
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/q Yes that looks great, please include the two injection issues but I'll fix the path traversal issue myself.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Great! I've created new pull request #61 to address these three issues. I will update that pull request as I work.
| } | ||
|
|
||
| const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key | ||
| const password = "admin123" // Hardcoded password |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Hardcoded password in source code. This is a major security vulnerability that must be fixed before merging.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/q Fix this in your next revision please
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it, I'll include this in my next pull request once you request one.
|
|
||
| const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key | ||
| const password = "admin123" // Hardcoded password | ||
| const dbConnection = "postgresql://user:password123@localhost:5432/db" // Database credentials in code |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Database connection string with embedded credentials. This exposes database access credentials and violates security best practices.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/q Ignore this one though, it's fine not a security risk
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it, I won't include this in my next pull request if you request one.
|
|
||
| // Command injection vulnerability | ||
| function executeCommand(userInput: string) { | ||
| child_process.exec(`ls ${userInput}`) // Unsafe command execution |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
child_process.exec() without sanitization. This could allow arbitrary command execution. Use execFile() with proper argument validation instead.
Would you like me to help you address this issue?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/q Can you help me fix this problem?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From Dan: This is an example of when the changes are probably too big for inline suggestions and a new pr might be preferred.
Here's how to fix the multiple security vulnerabilities in this code:
1. Remove hardcoded credentials and use environment variables:
// Replace hardcoded secrets with environment variables
const apiKey = process.env.API_KEY || (() => { throw new Error('API_KEY environment variable is required') })()
const password = process.env.DB_PASSWORD || (() => { throw new Error('DB_PASSWORD environment variable is required') })()
const dbConnection = `postgresql://${process.env.DB_USER}:${process.env.DB_PASSWORD}@${process.env.DB_HOST}:${process.env.DB_PORT}/${process.env.DB_NAME}`2. Fix command injection vulnerability using execFile:
import { execFile } from 'child_process'
import { promisify } from 'util'
const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile)
// Safe command execution with input validation
async function executeCommand(userInput: string) {
// Validate input - only allow alphanumeric characters, dots, and hyphens
if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9.\-_/]+$/.test(userInput)) {
throw new Error('Invalid input: only alphanumeric characters, dots, hyphens, underscores, and forward slashes are allowed')
}
// Use execFile instead of exec to prevent command injection
try {
const { stdout } = await execFileAsync('ls', [userInput])
return stdout
} catch (error) {
throw new Error(`Command execution failed: ${error}`)
}
}3. Fix path traversal vulnerability:
import * as path from 'path'
// Safe file reading with path validation
function readUserFile(filename: string) {
// Validate filename - no path traversal characters
if (filename.includes('..') || filename.includes('/') || filename.includes('\\')) {
throw new Error('Invalid filename: path traversal attempts are not allowed')
}
// Ensure filename only contains safe characters
if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9.\-_]+$/.test(filename)) {
throw new Error('Invalid filename: only alphanumeric characters, dots, hyphens, and underscores are allowed')
}
// Resolve and validate the final path
const safePath = path.resolve('/tmp', filename)
if (!safePath.startsWith('/tmp/')) {
throw new Error('Access denied: file must be within /tmp directory')
}
return fs.readFileSync(safePath)
}4. Fix SQL injection vulnerability using parameterized queries:
// Safe SQL query using parameterized statements
// Note: This example assumes you're using a proper database library like pg, mysql2, etc.
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1' // Use parameterized query
const userId = parseInt(process.argv[2], 10) // Validate and parse input
// When executing: db.query(query, [userId])These fixes address command injection1, hardcoded credentials2, path traversal3, and SQL injection4 vulnerabilities. Always validate user input, use parameterized queries, store secrets in environment variables, and use secure APIs like execFile instead of exec.
Footnotes
-
CWE-78: OS Command Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html ↩
-
CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html ↩
-
CWE-22: Path Traversal - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html ↩
-
CWE-89: SQL Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html ↩
|
|
||
| // Path traversal vulnerability | ||
| function readUserFile(filename: string) { | ||
| fs.readFileSync(`/tmp/${filename}`) // No path validation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
../ sequences. Implement proper path validation and sanitization.
| fs.readFileSync(`/tmp/${filename}`) // No path validation | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| // SQL injection pattern |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
process.argv[2] is directly interpolated into the SQL query without parameterization. Use prepared statements or parameterized queries instead.
| return; | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| downloadFiles([ |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| // Get schedule name | ||
| const scheduleName = await showInputBox({ | ||
| title: 'Schedule Name', | ||
| placeholder: 'my-daily-backup-schedule', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✅ Good implementation: The input validation for schedule names is well-implemented with proper regex validation and length checks. This follows security best practices for user input handling.
|
/q Hey q, make a new pr for this stuff |
|
You have marked several comments for a new pull request, would you like me to create that now?
|
|
/q Yes that's fine, please proceed |
|
Great, I have created pull request #59 . I will update it as I work. |
|
/q Hey q, make a new pr for the hardcoded creds stuff, but don't worry about the other things. I'll fix it myself. |
|
Great, I will work on these issues in a new pull request. Would you like me to proceed?
|
|
/q Yes that's fine, please proceed |
|
Great, I have created pull request #59 . I will update it as I work. |
Problem
Solution
feature/xbranches will not be squash-merged at release time.