Skip to content

Conversation

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner

@cobbdan cobbdan commented Sep 25, 2025

Problem

Solution


  • Treat all work as PUBLIC. Private feature/x branches will not be squash-merged at release time.
  • Your code changes must meet the guidelines in CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • License: I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as off-topic.

Copy link
Owner Author

@cobbdan cobbdan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Security Review Summary

This PR introduces critical security vulnerabilities that must be addressed before merging:

🚨 Critical Issues (Must Fix):

  • Hardcoded credentials: API keys, passwords, and database connection strings in source code
  • Command injection: Unsafe execution of user input in shell commands
  • Path traversal: Unvalidated file path access
  • SQL injection: Direct interpolation of user input in SQL queries

⚠️ Security Concerns:

  • Downloading external code during production builds without verification

✅ Positive Notes:

  • EventBridge Scheduler implementation shows good input validation practices
  • Well-structured code organization for the new AWS service integration

Recommendation: Please remove all hardcoded credentials and fix the injection vulnerabilities before requesting another review. Consider using environment variables, AWS Secrets Manager, or other secure credential management solutions.

}
}

const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Hardcoded API key detected. This exposes sensitive credentials in source code and should be removed immediately. Use environment variables or secure credential management instead.

Copy link
Owner Author

@cobbdan cobbdan Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/q Please help me fix this issue but do it in a new pr

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Okay I will start working on a new pull request that addresses this security issue. Would you like me to also address any of these other critical issues as well?

  • Command injection: Unsafe execution of user input in shell commands
  • Path traversal: Unvalidated file path access
  • SQL injection: Direct interpolation of user input in SQL queries

Copy link
Owner Author

@cobbdan cobbdan Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/q Yes that looks great, please include the two injection issues but I'll fix the path traversal issue myself.

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great! I've created new pull request #61 to address these three issues. I will update that pull request as I work.

}

const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key
const password = "admin123" // Hardcoded password
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Hardcoded password in source code. This is a major security vulnerability that must be fixed before merging.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/q Fix this in your next revision please

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, I'll include this in my next pull request once you request one.


const apiKey = "sk-1234567890abcdef1234567890abcdef" // Hardcoded API key
const password = "admin123" // Hardcoded password
const dbConnection = "postgresql://user:password123@localhost:5432/db" // Database credentials in code
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚨 CRITICAL SECURITY ISSUE: Database connection string with embedded credentials. This exposes database access credentials and violates security best practices.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/q Ignore this one though, it's fine not a security risk

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Got it, I won't include this in my next pull request if you request one.


// Command injection vulnerability
function executeCommand(userInput: string) {
child_process.exec(`ls ${userInput}`) // Unsafe command execution
Copy link
Owner Author

@cobbdan cobbdan Sep 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ SECURITY VULNERABILITY: Command injection risk. User input is directly passed to child_process.exec() without sanitization. This could allow arbitrary command execution. Use execFile() with proper argument validation instead.

Would you like me to help you address this issue?

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/q Can you help me fix this problem?

Copy link

@amazon-q-developer amazon-q-developer bot Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From Dan: This is an example of when the changes are probably too big for inline suggestions and a new pr might be preferred.

Here's how to fix the multiple security vulnerabilities in this code:

1. Remove hardcoded credentials and use environment variables:

// Replace hardcoded secrets with environment variables
const apiKey = process.env.API_KEY || (() => { throw new Error('API_KEY environment variable is required') })()
const password = process.env.DB_PASSWORD || (() => { throw new Error('DB_PASSWORD environment variable is required') })()
const dbConnection = `postgresql://${process.env.DB_USER}:${process.env.DB_PASSWORD}@${process.env.DB_HOST}:${process.env.DB_PORT}/${process.env.DB_NAME}`

2. Fix command injection vulnerability using execFile:

import { execFile } from 'child_process'
import { promisify } from 'util'

const execFileAsync = promisify(execFile)

// Safe command execution with input validation
async function executeCommand(userInput: string) {
    // Validate input - only allow alphanumeric characters, dots, and hyphens
    if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9.\-_/]+$/.test(userInput)) {
        throw new Error('Invalid input: only alphanumeric characters, dots, hyphens, underscores, and forward slashes are allowed')
    }
    
    // Use execFile instead of exec to prevent command injection
    try {
        const { stdout } = await execFileAsync('ls', [userInput])
        return stdout
    } catch (error) {
        throw new Error(`Command execution failed: ${error}`)
    }
}

3. Fix path traversal vulnerability:

import * as path from 'path'

// Safe file reading with path validation
function readUserFile(filename: string) {
    // Validate filename - no path traversal characters
    if (filename.includes('..') || filename.includes('/') || filename.includes('\\')) {
        throw new Error('Invalid filename: path traversal attempts are not allowed')
    }
    
    // Ensure filename only contains safe characters
    if (!/^[a-zA-Z0-9.\-_]+$/.test(filename)) {
        throw new Error('Invalid filename: only alphanumeric characters, dots, hyphens, and underscores are allowed')
    }
    
    // Resolve and validate the final path
    const safePath = path.resolve('/tmp', filename)
    if (!safePath.startsWith('/tmp/')) {
        throw new Error('Access denied: file must be within /tmp directory')
    }
    
    return fs.readFileSync(safePath)
}

4. Fix SQL injection vulnerability using parameterized queries:

// Safe SQL query using parameterized statements
// Note: This example assumes you're using a proper database library like pg, mysql2, etc.
const query = 'SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1' // Use parameterized query
const userId = parseInt(process.argv[2], 10) // Validate and parse input

// When executing: db.query(query, [userId])

These fixes address command injection1, hardcoded credentials2, path traversal3, and SQL injection4 vulnerabilities. Always validate user input, use parameterized queries, store secrets in environment variables, and use secure APIs like execFile instead of exec.

Footnotes

  1. CWE-78: OS Command Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/78.html

  2. CWE-798: Use of Hard-coded Credentials - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/798.html

  3. CWE-22: Path Traversal - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/22.html

  4. CWE-89: SQL Injection - https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/89.html


// Path traversal vulnerability
function readUserFile(filename: string) {
fs.readFileSync(`/tmp/${filename}`) // No path validation
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ SECURITY VULNERABILITY: Path traversal vulnerability. The filename parameter is not validated, allowing potential access to files outside the intended directory using ../ sequences. Implement proper path validation and sanitization.

fs.readFileSync(`/tmp/${filename}`) // No path validation
}

// SQL injection pattern
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ SECURITY VULNERABILITY: SQL injection vulnerability. User input from process.argv[2] is directly interpolated into the SQL query without parameterization. Use prepared statements or parameterized queries instead.

return;
}

downloadFiles([
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ SECURITY CONCERN: Downloading and executing code from external sources during production builds poses security risks. Consider using verified artifacts, checksums, or signed packages instead of downloading raw files from GitHub.

// Get schedule name
const scheduleName = await showInputBox({
title: 'Schedule Name',
placeholder: 'my-daily-backup-schedule',
Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good implementation: The input validation for schedule names is well-implemented with proper regex validation and length checks. This follows security best practices for user input handling.

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner Author

cobbdan commented Sep 26, 2025

/q Hey q, make a new pr for this stuff

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner Author

cobbdan commented Sep 26, 2025

You have marked several comments for a new pull request, would you like me to create that now?

  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj
  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj
  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj
  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link

amazon-q-developer bot commented Sep 26, 2025

/q Yes that's fine, please proceed

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner Author

cobbdan commented Sep 26, 2025

Great, I have created pull request #59 . I will update it as I work.

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link

amazon-q-developer bot commented Sep 26, 2025

/q Hey q, make a new pr for the hardcoded creds stuff, but don't worry about the other things. I'll fix it myself.

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner Author

cobbdan commented Sep 26, 2025

Great, I will work on these issues in a new pull request. Would you like me to proceed?

  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj
  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj
  • Comment A - sldkfjlskdejflksdjj

@cobbdan
Copy link
Owner Author

cobbdan commented Sep 26, 2025

/q Yes that's fine, please proceed

@amazon-q-developer
Copy link

amazon-q-developer bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Great, I have created pull request #59 . I will update it as I work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants